Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/148/149 bail, Ipsi dixit's refusal of the police was not binding on the court unless it was made on the basis of the same concrete and inquisitive column. No. 3 was charged. The challan was not cross-examined by the prosecutor despite the fact that the inspection was recorded in eight prosecution witnesses, and he could not request a long trial in ocular and medical evidence, which was deep and pre-emptive of evidence. Time diagnosis was needed. Not valid at this stage, because the trial has already progressed substantially, and any observation by the High Court may prejudice any party, causing Bell to sue in the circumstances. The accused was denied with instructions to close the case. Four month period
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
