HAQ NAWAZ versus MEMBER (COLONIES), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Article 8 Constitution of Government Land (Punjab) Act (v. 1912), Sections 10 (2) and 30 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Allocation for Land Disposal of Mangla Dam Second Review, Response The eligibility of the veterans, who were expelled from the Mangla Dam and holding a certificate of eligibility for alternative allotment purposes, were allotted and, over time, the Board of Revenue regularized not only the defendants' land. , But other people were also placed in the same location. The respondents had also received a conveyance deadline after depositing the entire value in the defendants' treasury, as well as the review process with the allotment was regularized, the applicant said, disappointed. The management has applied for a second review in terms of Section 8 of West Pakistan. The Board of Revenue Act, 1957, canceled the order of the allotment, but said that the request was rejected, and the request for review was approved by Order Member Bower. In its jurisdiction under section 8 of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act, 1957, the Board of Revenue was not eligible for a second review, after which the defendant / owner was given proprietary rights, subject to the terms and conditions. Was not bound by the rules and became the absolute owner in relation to the land granted to him by the Collector's Board of Revenue; this allotment in respect of the ownership rights of the property was not canceled by the Board of Revenue Allotment Order. Can only go back if there are allegations of fraud and misrepresentation. Against allotment, the authority could go before the Civil Land Court because Go
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
