Find a Lawyer

QAISAR ALI ALIAS QASAR versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) Validation of Evidence Value The version presented by the complainant in the FIR and the version presented by the prosecutor identifies numerous injuries from medical evidence, as well as on the body of the eyewitnesses who testified. Is equivalent to the number of wounds. There were witnesses of the occasion who did not see the incident and their statements did not encourage trust. On the occasion of the recovery of the pistol with the availability of crime and the report of the forensic science laboratory, no ocular testimony was confirmed. ? The prosecution's case, therefore, was not beyond doubt, especially when the counterfeiting of oral evidence by medical evidence had overturned this version because the accused was acquitted by the prosecution's attempt to establish. ?

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• SHAFA ULLAH KHAN v. SHOIB AKHTAR 2009 YLR 40
• BISMA TEXTILE MILLS LTD. through Chief Executive v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division/Chairman F.B.R. 2009 PTD 41
• FAIZ MUHAMMAD v. Mst. KHURSHID BIBI 2009 PLD 41
• ALI USMAN FAIZ v. CHAIRMAN 2009 MLD 42
• MUHAMMAD SALEH ASIM v. SECRETARY SCHOOLS EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE 2009 PLC(CS) 44
• SHAMIM AHMAD KHAN v. ASSISTANT ENGINEER PHONES, DIGITAL (INTERNAL), DEFENCE EXCHANGE, (PTCL), LAHORE 2009 PLC 44
• ASHFAQ HUSSAIN SHAH v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NEW TOWN, RAWALPINDI 2009 YLR 47
• NAWAB ALI v. JAVAID IQBAL NABI 2009 PLD 49

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

lawer from fb area from Pannu aqil lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes