Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD LUQMAN versus STATE

The grant of the Ocular Version given in the Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/337 F (v) / 148/149 Guarantee, FIR is against the evidence and the trial is still pending. The hearing was not to decide whose fire they were aware of. The shooting proved effective between the two accused, with the accused being involved in the physical part of the injured witness as a co-accused who was bailed out by the High Court charge. ? The case, but not yet a single witness has been examined and the accused was behind bars for about nine months, in which case the accused was granted bail.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• HABIB-UR-REHMAN v. D.P.O. 2009 PLD 69
• NAZIR AHMED NASIR v. State LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN 2009 PLC(CS) 70
• AMAS CNG through Managing Partner v. ZILA NAZIM 2009 MLD 71
• KANIZ FATIMA v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2009 PLD 71
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. METAL FORMING LTD. 2009 PTD 75
• MCB BANK LTD. through Attorney v. SAAD AKHTAR QURESHI 2009 PLC 75
• MUSHTAQ AHMAD JAVED v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN 2009 PLC(CS) 76
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector Narowal v. SULTAN AHMAD 2009 YLR 77

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

property advocates from Darya Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes