Section 216 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX 1965), Section 13 (b) Explosives Act (VI of 1908), 5 407 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 21 J & 19 (8B) ) Definition of evidence In the conviction, the deficient police party, for the arrest of an aggravated offender, raided a house where it was said that the accused was also present with the accused persons and they were arrested. What was supposed to happen was his relative's acceptance of the explosive act. Substance Act, 1908 was concerned, still could not maintain this field in view of subsection (8B) of section 19 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the cell parcel brought to the bomb disposal commander, containing the explosive assembly. There were two grenades. It has been fully proved that the hand grenade recovered from the possession of one of the defendants was an explosive contradiction, according to the prosecutor's statement that the prosecution's witnesses stated that it was normal for the accused's lawyer and that It was not enough to believe that a case was registered against the accused. One of the suspects was accused of retrieving hand grenades from suspicious hands from the bottom of a man's bed. It cannot be said, in the circumstances, that the hand grenade was not recovered from the possession of the accused as he was found lying on the bed of prosecution. In the circumstances, his case against the suspects has proved beyond reasonable doubt. ? The trial was conducted under trial and sentenced to seven counts under Section 216, PPC, Section 21J Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 and Section 4 of the Explosives Act, 1908, against the accused.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
