Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SALEEM BEG versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUJRAT


Once the allegations of corruption should be based on some concrete facts, the personal opinion of the competent authority on negative credibility should support some solid evidence. The accused appealed, in the circumstances, the order of acceptance and removal was assigned to the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), section 4

1980 P L C (C. S.) 92 (1)

[Service Tribunal Punjab]

Present : M. Saleem Chaudhry, Chairman and Mazhar Muneer, Member

MUHAMMAD SALEEM BEG

Versus

SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUJRAT

Appeal No. 312 of 1978, decided on 20th August, 1979.

Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1978‑

‑‑-----R. S.‑Corruption‑Allegation of‑Must be based on some solid facts‑Subjective opinion of competent authority about adverse repu tation should be supported by some tangible evidence‑Accused should be confronted with such evidence‑Removal from service‑Based upon corruption allegations in character. roll without tangible evidence and confrontation therewith of accused‑Appeal, in circumstances, accepted and removal order set aside‑Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S. 4.

JUDGMENT

M. SALEEM CHAUDHRY (CHAIRMAN).‑----

This is an appeal filed by Mr. M. Saleem Beg, ex‑A. S. I., against the order of S. P., Gujrat dated 27‑11‑1977 whereby he was removed from service. His appeal to the D. I.‑G. was rejected on 11‑6-1978. His review petition was also rejected by the I.‑G. The orders of the I.‑G. were conveyed to him on 28‑9‑1978.

2. The appellant joined service as Foot Constable and promoted to the post of A. S. I. in 1970 and confirmed as A.SA. in 1972. M. L. A. issued direc tive on 8‑10‑1977 asking the S. P. or Additional S. P. to take action against the official/officials. As a result of this directive and on account of allegations of corruptions as reflected in the A.C.Rs. of 1972, 1974 and 1976, the appellant was removed from service.

3. We have heard the parties and perused the record. The Tribunal has held in Appeal No. 268/63 of 1977 that the allegations of corruption must be based on some solid facts and the subjective opinion of the competent authority about the adverse reputation of his subordinate should be supported by some tangible evidence and the accused official should be confronted with the same. This does not seem to be the position in this case and the present case seems to be on all four with Appeal No. 268/63. In view of the reasons given in that case, the appeal of the appellant is accepted and orders of removal from service set aside.

Appeal accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Abbottabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.