Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

JAFFAR KHAN versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE


Article 185 There is no legal question of any public importance in which the eligibility for appeal for special leave should be excluded because of merit

1980 S C M R 707

Present: Dorab Patel, Muhammad Haleem and Aslam Riaz Hussain, JJ

JAFFAR KHAN‑Petitioner

Versus

CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K‑62 of 1978, decided on 12th January, 1980.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Service Tribunal, Islamabad dated 10‑1‑1978 in Appeal No. 47 (K) of 1977).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

‑‑ Art. 185‑No legal question of any public importance involved in case‑Petition for special leave to appeal dismissed as having no merit.

Muzafar Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 12th January, 1980.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD HALEEM, J.

‑The petitioner seeks special leave to appeal against the order of the Service Tribunal, Islamabad, dated 10th of January, 1978, by which Appeal No. 47 (K) was dismissed.

The petitioner who is a driver refused to obey the order as on 6th of January, 1976, to drive the car of the Assistant Collector (Preventive), on the ground that he was a sepoy for which disciplinary proceedings were instituted against him and he was dismissed from service : and his appeal to the Central Board of Revenue against it was also dismissed. He next instituted the present appeal began the Service Tribunal, Islamabad, for redress but did not succeed as it was held that as a sepoy he worked as a driver and further that he was guilty of insubordination.

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks special leave to appeal against the order on the short ground that being a sepoy he could not be transferred against a driver's vacancy but that objection was decided against him as he was held to be working as a driver in that capacity. As for his act of insubordination, it was also established against him. As no legal question of any public importance is involved, we see no merit in this petition; and equally there is no merit in his submission that he was not guilty of any wanton behaviour.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Shakargarh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.