Sections 2302 (b) / & 34 & 606060 Appraising evidence that the victim was taken to the hospital by the complainant before his death proved his presence at the time of his presence, even otherwise, at night strange The complaint of the father of the deceased during the hours in the house was of a natural nature and it cannot be doubted that an FIR was lodged without any further delay which included the names of the witnesses and the accused in their role. Also, witnesses' close association with the victim was not enough to reject their statements and to announce them. As witnesses interested in the absence of any hostility or enmity, as long as the accused is brought on record, his eyewitness witnesses the incident, consisting of a complainant hat, straightforwardly and confidently. That is, the identity of the accused, the role played by him, the date, time, and location of the witness agree on the point of view of the accused's identity, and in the light of the electric bulb developed by the character, the patwari and the investigating officer. Not displaying the bulb in the site plans was the only exception, could not adversely affect the prosecution's case However, the ocular testimony was credible, alone enough to link the accused to the commission of the crime, which also had full support for recovery and medical evidence, proving through any evidence the defendant's request for defense. Was not made, the record did not reveal anything about the accused's false involvement. In the cases, the prosecutor himself stated that the accused was suspected of having illicit contact with his wife and
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
