MUKHTAR AHMAD QURESHI versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION ISLAMPURA, LAHORE
Sections 2020 46, 8 468 and 1 471 of the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 195 (1) (c) of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 intra-court appellant appellant appealed to a single High Court judge Demand was made in an approved question order. Under this, the High Court rejected his prayer for termination of the FIR after giving every opportunity to look into the matter and to hear both sides, and proceeded to see that Although an incomplete challan was produced before the trial court, the FIR had a specific charge against the appellant / accused. And in order to invoke it against himself, the first fax, he filed a lawsuit against him, a single High Court judge rightly found that the alleged sale agreement was in fact a dispute, so constitutionally. Even this cannot be solved. The High Court has jurisdiction that the registration of the FIR was a violation Section Section 195 (1) (c), the provisions of the CRPC, was canceled. In the present case, there was agreement to sell the documents contained in the dispute. Which was processed and a civil lawsuit was filed. In which the interim order was obtained. And then the affected FIR was filed, indicating that this document had been processed a lot before the case was filed and that it was prepared outside the court and this section 195 (1) ( C) will not fall within the scope of the CCP Appellant was specifically designated in the FIR and was precisely charged, if the FIR were taken into account in its significance, The wrestlers of the same case, Shin
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
