A. XVI, R 1 (3), Proviso & O XVII, R 3 Defendant's evidence was confirmed 14 days ago for the failure of the summons to appear before the witness's testimony not being presented. The court received notice that the defendant objected to the recording of partial evidence of the plaintiff's two witnesses in the trial court when the defendant's witnesses in the court at the last date of the hearing had objected to his failure to find the witness. Postponed action without recording 's statements. The absence of a witness seeking justification to provide evidence on his shoulders on the postponement date was sufficient for the postponement of the adjournment court; Should be adjusted, the adjustment will be made on the last hearing date. O XVII, R 3, the delay in the CPC respondent's motion to grant the petition, shall not be attracted to such court by the first date of the hearing itself fixed under XVI, R 1 (3). The terms were waived, therefore, it should have given the plaintiff another opportunity to seek summons on the student witness, as the plaintiff's conduct was not contradictory because the student witness was served. This can be compensated by paying a delayed cost to the person affected because the High Court set aside the unidentified order and instructed the trial court to allow the plaintiff to present 2 to 3 opportunities for trial. Directed to get the remand, subject to payment of Rs 5,000.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
