Articles & 76 & 6 15 Insurance Insurance Company's Inclusion in Misleading or Deceptive Practices The insurance company's website gives the general public the impression that by displaying some misleading and deceptive content to the company, property insurance, motor insurance , Writing health insurance products is allowed. Regarding these products in the aforementioned company's website, the company only granted underwriter / transact credit and certain skype class of business video certificates of registration on May 28, 2010, the company's website stated \ Future products are subject to authorized approval. The authority, and the company did not approach the commission to allow other classes of insurance business as set forth in the Insurance Ordinance 2000, on the Company's website disclosing future product related misleading information to the public at large. And there were chances that the Company's written policies may fall under other business segments for which the Company was not authorized by the Underwriting Company, in the event of violation of section 76 (1) of the Insurance Ordinance 2000 , Which attracted the provisions under section 76 (5) or section 156 of the Ordinance. The Insurance Ordinance, 2000 was implemented because the company and its directors had to ensure that the company's website directors, besides operating and managing the company's day, had any misinformation. The business, too, had some "duty-recognition" duties, namely trust duties and some of the broader duties imposed by law. And violating these legal duties would usually be a criminal offense, a fine
Related judgments — Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, 2014
