The trial court appeals court's decision and dismisses the trial court's decision to dismiss sections 6 and 13 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXLI, R31 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution Petition. The source rejected, except to the extent that the plaintiff's right to know the superiority of the suit, came to the conclusion that the plaintiff would take the plaintiff to the extent of his replacement, after five months. , The plaintiff found that he had been instructed to submit an injunction. Within thirty days, the amount for which the period expired and the case was terminated, the petition filed by the plaintiff for premature deposit at the trial was rejected and filed by the plaintiff. The review was also obtained from the same fate that the plaintiff filed. The decision of the constitutional petition and the trial court were completely dropped by the appellate court below, except that the party may be equally entitled to premature termination, but the reviewing court has Had not accepted this aspect of the case, the parties were certainly prejudiced not to consider this aspect of the case and, under the provisions of the AXLE, R31, CPC, the court In order to formulate and answer the important question, which did not occur in this case, the constitutional petition was granted and the controversial order of the reviewing court, without any ANNONAY was found to be without any legal effect and lace option left for them was the decision to exempt this decision. Opportunity to listen to the parties or their suggestions
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
