NABI DAD versus REGISTRAR COURT OF APPEALS, JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT, G.H.Q. RAWALPINDI
Sections 8 (1), 59 (a) and 133b Pakistan Army Act Rules, R54 Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (B) Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 109 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (1965) XX)), Sections 9, 13 and 13E Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 382 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Telephone Exchange for bomb aid and plantation charges, unlicensed pistols and He was convicted of possessing 60 rounds by Field General Court Marshall, serving a dismissal form and suffering RI for 17 years. Appeal by the authorized authority to ban 2/2 years out of 17 years, cases of legal stability in the exclusive jurisdiction of the Anti-Terrorism Court in respect of the Pakistan Army Act 1952, Criminal Jurisdiction Section 59, Pakistan Army Act It can be prosecuted by a court martial under 1952; if a person has committed such an offense, it is said that the applicant was subject to the Pakistan Army Act 1952. The ND was found guilty of declaring sanctions under section 59 under section 7 (b) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 and was read with section 109 of the Code of Conduct 1860 and for possessing weapons and ammunition. Was read under section 13 of section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance. , A court formed under the Pakistan Army Act 1952 in 1965, can impose a sentence in respect of all the offenses in which the applicant was found guilty, the High Court dismissed the constitutional application in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2009
