FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus MIAN MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF
Article 204 The Supreme Court Arguments Arguments \ The lawyer was found to be abusive and vicious by the Supreme Court, which did not have the legs to stand in the eyes of law applicants and his lawyer was in fact a Supreme Court judge. I tried to make a distinction. The two factions, the PCO and the non-PCO judges, were all present judges who were sworn in under the current constitution, and no discrimination or discrimination could be made by the applicants in the matter. And the game of governance was played and brought under the jurisdiction of the judicial institutions, so as to end the two factions in the judiciary, to create prejudices and differences among the judges, to work in the peaceful, harmonious and smooth running of the Supreme Court. Interrupted. , Which was the most harmful and sinful act, the petitioner's plea, position and position. Dignitaries and Brother Judges, including any discrimination and discrimination and persons belonging to one or the other group, cannot be allowed or allowed to be made or raised by any of the judges of the Supreme Court at this stage. All the judges have taken an oath under it. In the present constitution, some of them could not be preferred against or against the petitioners or their counsel and on the basis of which the alliance between the judges to defraud through such baseless, baseless and baseless premises. Was tried. Serious insults that cannot be forgiven / cannot be forgiven Applicants who have sworn affidavits by directing their lawyer through their arguments,
