FAZAL-UR-REHMAN HANIF versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TALUKA POLICE STATION, MIRPURKHAS
Sections 6, 156 (1) (8) (89), 168 (2), 171 and 180 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the applicant from a vehicle operated by the applicant with three thousand towels. The gold was recovered, it was sued under Section 156 (1) (8) (89) of the Customs Act, 1969 and the vehicle was recovered and the petition filed before the Customs Appellate Tribunal. Appeals and special customs appeals related to Germany were also fined. The petitioner was dismissed by the High Court convictions. That the Traffic Police Inspector was not notified as a Customs Officer under Section 6 of the Customs Act 1969, he was not authorized to search the vehicle and seize the gold. That no notice was given under Sections 168 (2), 171 and 180 of the Customs Act, 1969, which required the prosecution, including judicial proceedings, that the action by the police and the customs authority was illegal and the gold recovered was not recovered. It was proved that the smuggling was not done and that the question of law was properly considered in the appeal by the High Court and that the constitutional petition should consider the disputes raised by the applicant. Had enough power. Appeal was granted leave to consider the applicant's misdeeds
