MUHAMMAD HANIF versus SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR
Sections 5 and 3 Revised Holiday Rules, 1980 Office Memorandum No. F (1) Rev 1/78, Dated 219 1978, Para 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Mandatory Retirement Government Employee 90-Day Term Was granted \ ex Pakistan discharged for medical treatment and refused further extension of leave Government employee fails to join duty at the expiration of leave without waiting for return from abroad He was recorded on the previous action record that no charge sheet was issued to the civil servant. As required under Section 3 (2), the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, removal of public servants from 2000, by providing a defense response and defending reason on the charge sheet required in the first phase required by the law authority. Lost The basic principles of natural justice should have been adopted unless explicitly excluded, so that such action could not be sustained which would have justified the defense of public employment. The provisions of section 5 of the Act, Withdrawal from the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, considered that full inquiry should be made to provide opportunity to the public servant, in relation to the misconduct set forth in section 3 of the said ordinance. Make it clear that the authority was not authorized to refuse leave on the EOL (leave without pay) public servant served for his credit for 26 years and under the Revised Leave Rules, 1980 EOL was entitled to unpaid salary for a maximum period of 5 years; if it has served more than 10 years, the authority has no justification for denying EOL.
