SYED GHULAM ABBAS ASHRAF versus PROVINCIAL DIRECTOR, LOCAL FUND AUDIT, PUNJAB, LAHORE
RR 2 (5), 3, 4 (1) (b) (iv) and 5 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (v. 1974), the removal of the appeal service from section 4 of the appellant has been abolished after the charge sheet and holding. went. After inquiring into some allegations of disqualification, corruption, etc., the appellant made a serious allegation of discriminatory treatment against the authority, stating that the authority had not only been discriminated against, but also filed by it. The complaint has also led to insecurity. The appellant did not rule out the allegations against the authority in the appellant's case against the higher appellants under R2 (5) of the Punjab Civil Servant (Affinity and Discipline) Rules, 1999, which was against the case. The action was not taken as a result of personal interest. And the authority needed to notify the appellate authority of the issue on which the orders passed by the authority were generally competent. And such an appellate authority had to appoint a competent officer of the relevant position and status, because the authority could not expect justice from the appellant authority with which the relations had led to tension as well as the FIR inquiry proceedings. The filing, under the circumstances, was not done in a fair and transparent manner, and the impeachment orders approved by the departmental authorities were set aside and the appellant was ordered to be re-served, dismissing and reinstating the job. The interval between shall be considered extraordinary leave without pay
