Sections 2 (s), 16, 156 (1), (7), (9), (77), (89), (90), 168 and 178 trafficking of smuggling and sale of vehicles in auction despite appellate tribunal The forensic science laboratory was immediately examined during the course of the prosecution in the back of the appellant to review the preparation of the van van order for testing, despite the fact that it was a futile exercise. Was since For a long time the exclusive possession of the customs staff and without its authority the appellant could be accessed and the actual condition and condition could not be legally and judicially appellant examined the author of the laboratory report. Was denied the right to do so. And even his request for a re-examination of `Wayne` was rejected despite the fact that the presence of the Adjudicating Officer in numerous similarity cases, despite the presence of laboratory reports, tested the vehicle more than once. The first vehicle appealed was dismissed by the first appellate authority without touching on the merits of the trial and without exercising its free mind and proceeded only with the auction of its subordinate customs staff`s van The Additional Collector has concluded this. Despite the possibility of the appellant's appellant's complaint to the customs collector, the decision by the appellate tribunal to resist the failure of the order of the appellant to re-examine `Van The Preparation Order ' Had given. There was no confiscation by the customs authority and in this case the last chance to check the accuracy of the charge or any other type, the vehicle was seized.
