Sections 25, 32, 32A, 79, 80, 156, 181 and 194A Customs Rules, 2001, Articles 107, 109 and 110 specify the specification, classification, quantity, and pricing of imported goods. The appeal was alleged. They deliberately falsified the description, classification, quantity and price of the imported goods and, in addition to importing additional quantities, forbidden goods, intentionally and with the express purpose of suppressing the price. , Tried to deceive the government with legitimate income from its legitimate income. The imported goods were seized at Rs 207,404, however, the importer was given the option to redeem the fine after the return of the fine if the amount was higher than the figure, the examiner's officer The test report should have been stated in clear terms. More than the declared quantity was found, but in the present case it was not done, nor were such charges made in showbiz to such an extent that the charges of ice against the importer were extinguished when the Customs Department Even if you disagree with the price of the goods, you will assume the responsibility of producing the material to confirm that the price of the goods was declared wrong, but the department failed to do so. The allegation of falsifying the price on the basis of volatile and speculative goods, which were not mentioned in the Charter of Show Notes, was then not accepted by the Adjustment Authority in a decree order. Can be done and on the basis of this, actually the impugned order was a shoddy showcase not mentioned by the evil,
