CAPTAIN (RETD.) IZAT JAVAID KHAN versus AHMAD KHAN BALOCH
Sections 55 and 63 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OVI, R 15 Impact of invalid verification of election request Paragraph redistribution, certiorari and failure to confirm date List of witnesses, Retired candidate excludes election application on this basis Demanded. There was no proper validation as stated on the validity of the OVI, R 15, CPC, the applicant did not comply with the prerequisites of the applicant's validity of law and validated on his own knowledge Refrain from distributing paragraphs and information received. To believe it and to be true, non-compliance, which the applicant was particularly obliged to state, according to his own knowledge, was confirmed which paragraph of the election petition and whatever facts he received. Believed in There was no formal status but it could have different consequences. The applicant did not mention the place where the place of verification was. According to the law, the applicant did not endorse the law and this led to the contents of the election petition. It was certified that this date was not mentioned, which is why mandatory supply of Section 55 (3) of the Public Representation Act 1976. Even the applicant was not complied with, even though it was deemed necessary to support the contents of the election petition under his oath. The applicant also did not confirm the supplement attached to the application under the provisions of section 55 (3) of the representation of the public. The Act, 1976, was not included in the list of witnesses that he wanted to present at trial or a summary of the facts, such as
Related judgments — Election Tribunal Punjab, 2010
