Sections 52, 55, 61, 65 and 99 Election Tribunal Power Academic Qualification Scrotney's notorious disqualification, the principle of respondent was declared a return candidate and the applicant had taken this choice on the basis that his matriculation and intermediate 'S certificates were fake and the result of fake play. The question raised by the applicant was that after the defendant was disqualified, he is declared as a returning candidate when the intermediate certificate issued by the board was the result of a defamatory claim automatically by the defendant The degree also lost its value because the defendants had obtained an Intermediate Certificate through duplication, so they were disqualified to contest that the declaration of the applicant's selection of a candidate would mean, in fact, the opinion. Voters cast their votes in favor of respondents, since they are not guilty N will be deprived of his right to represent the Provincial Assembly, knowing that the respondent Election Tribunal directed the Election Commission to allow the Election Commission to hold re-election as per law.
Related judgments — Election Tribunal Punjab, 2010
