Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MALIK GHULAM MOHY-UD-DIN versus THE STATE


The Punjab Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1951, does not specify the calendar year owner's death under the term \ Air Act Act \ Year defined in the year in which he dies.

P L D 1957 W. P. (Rev.) 24

Before H. A. Majid, Member Board

of Revenue, West Pakistan

Malik GHULAM MOHY‑UD‑DIN and others‑Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Revision Side No. 192 of 1955‑56, decided on 15th August 1956, District Layallpur.

(a) Punjab Agricultural Income Tax Act (XVI

of 1951)-----

---W

ord "year"‑Not defined in Act‑"Year" means calendar year.

(b) Punjab Agricultural Income Tar. Act (XVI

of 1951)-----

----‑

Owner's death‑His whole holding can be taken into account in year in which he passes away.

Ghulam Ali Alvi for Petitioners.

ORDER

H. A. MAJID.‑-----

Agricultural Income Tax is assessed every year. The word "year" is not defined in the Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1951, the assumption, therefore, is that the word "year" means the calendar year.

An assessee dies during the course of a year. The question arises whether the tax levied for that year should be in respect of his holding as a whole. The Act employs the following phraseology :‑

" The tax shall be assessed every year in respect of income from land."

" The tax shall be assessed on the basis of the total land revenue which was payable in respect of the preceding year.

This phraseology tends to show that the tax is really a tax on the income in the preceding year. On this basis, the assessee's whole holding can be taken into account in the year in which he passes away.

Another way of looking at the same matter would be that if an owner continues alive for one day in a particular year, he can be assessed under the Act in that year, and if he is so assessed, his whole holding would be taken into account.

For both the above reasons, I consider that the petitioners are not entitled to say that the second instalment of the year 1954, should be charged from them on the basis of their individual holdings inherited from their father on his death on 6th July 1954. 1, therefore, dismiss this petition for revision.

K. M. A. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Tarbela lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.