HAFIZ TARIQ SAEED, EX-DE PTCL, GUJRANWALA versus FEDERATION THROUGH SECRETARY, (IT & TELECOM DIVISION), MINISTRY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, ISLAMABAD
Section 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Implementation of the Removal of Fines Implementation of the Maintenance Order Restoration Order Implemented by the Chief of Inquiry Officer, A charge sheet was installed for invalid monitoring of. A slight penalty was proposed on the applicant, but the designated authority imposed a dismissal. Appellate Authority suspended applicant's removal from employment on the petitioner's appeal against major removal penalty and directed to reinstate the applicant was not reinstated, the applicant filed his constitutional The application was requested to be executed by the appellate authority, under which the applicant's rehabilitation was confirmed if the authority was not satisfied with the appellate order under which the applicant was reinstated. He had the right to seek treatment. Under the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, the appellate authority's decision was accepted with the help of procurement available under the law of discharge. Disobedience to this order was not only a force to enforce, but a gross violation of the principle of classification, which not only destroyed the rule of law, justice and acceptance, but also frustrated the officials. The disadvantage of the designated authority, therefore, cannot be seen with the kindness which was directed to comply with the authority's order within the stipulated period. \ r \ n
