ADAPTIVE SOLUTIONS (PVT.) LTD. versus UTILITY STORES CORPORATION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 12 and 20 de novo arbitration proceedings set aside for failure to file arbitration award of objection request, petitioner stated that new order for cancellation of arbitrator's authority and appointment of new arbitrator The arbitrator was appointed to carry out all legal and DW arbitration proceedings. Following the facts of the contract, the applicant submitted a petition to stop the proceedings where the application was waived by the former arbitrator. The applicant had alleged that the de novo order was brought to justice. Was against Equity and established principles of law and procedure, the applicant also alleged that the de novo action order was obtained through fraud and misrepresentation. Syed accused did not get any support from the record as his lawyers were present before the high court as well as the parties when the court ordered the holding of the de novo, a decision was granted by the arbitrator and approved by the arbitrator. The petitioner's counsel regarding the effect of recording the de novo evidence was never appealed by the applicant against the fact that the de novo proceedings could not be ordered by the court, without any power because the parties Had made a contract of his own which was presented before the court and the court had set aside the arbitral act in the Arbitration Act 1940 In view of the agreement between N, it was ordered that it be deemed that no arbitration proceedings could be ordered in any case under arbitration.
