Sections 184, 205 and 131 Increase in acquiring unidentified business capital The tax officer on the purchase of a tax officer has also increased the tax on the plot because he considered the construction and rental income on the plot, appealed by the examiner. At the time of filing, the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeal) had specified the assessment made by the taxation officer with specific instructions. If the tax officer had to confirm the purchase from the buyer, then the first appellate authority was formed after rejecting the original order while keeping the tax officer's assessment of the tax officer aside. Sources to confirm the money were not eliminated nor the date of the transaction was the transaction of this property Important location in the financial year 1999 2000, whose capital gains were shown in the statement of wealth reconciliation in 2000 year 2001. , But the taxation officer took advantage of the assessment year in 2001, the primary activity of Eskim in 2002 was to sell clothes. And that was not the case. Involved in the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals) shop and property sales and trading activity, the tax officer was treated without any reason, there was no justification for this increase. , Saying that the issue of individuality was an adventure in nature. In this regard, the increase in trade was deleted, in the circumstances concerning the increase due to the construction on the plot, the taxation officer had added, without any basis, as the plot was acquired by Skyty in 1996 and so on. In order to protect against encroachments and unused fees, boundary walls and temporary rooms in 1997
Related judgments — Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan, 2010
