Section 111 (1) (b), 177 (4), 120, 122 (5) and 129 (9) of section 122 (5) of the Income Tax Ordinance Procedure for adding unidentified income or asset audits without assumptions. The issuance of the notice was not sufficient under the law of section 129 (9) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 to audit the proceedings under the law before seeking the provisions of section 111 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001. Section 122 (5) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and there was no other provision in the law that allowed the Assigning Officer to amend or review a pre-assessed return of income before it Earnings can also be estimated or evaluated. The lower rate, such as the rate provided in section 122 (5) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, was the next step in the increase under section 111 of the 2001 Income Tax Ordinance, which should not be reached directly before the Assessing Officer is crossed. Under section 122 (5) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, fulfilling the constraints and conditions for the cancellation of the assessment under section 1120 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the Assessing Officer of 2001 had to fix this through audit. That the presumptive assessment was assessed as invalid under Section 122 (5) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 or on the terms and conditions provided under Sections 122 (5) and 122 (5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 On the basis of prejudice. In these provisions a separate estimate had previously explained all the deposits in his account to the satisfaction of the appellate authority and against which no significant argument was made. In addition, the assessment was not strictly in compliance with the provisions and the procedure provided in the Law Deletion was unimaginable and the Department
Related judgments — Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan, 2010
