Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL HAQUE versus STATE


Section 5 325/34 G afflicting complainant, the victim of the assault, confirms that the accused is in agreement with the appellant, some part of the sentence has already passed, the matter has been settled, And in view of the circumstances of the case, the agreement was accepted and the accused applicant acquitted.

1979 SCM R 507

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Karam Elahee Chauhan and

Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ

ABDUL HAQUE OTHERS‑Petitioners

versus

STATE‑‑Respondent

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 208 of X79, decided 16th 1979.

(On appeal from the order of the Lal High Court dated 4th of April 1979 in Cr R. N 288 of 1979)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)‑--

---S. 325/34‑Grievous hurt ‑ Compromise‑Complainant, victim of assault, confirming matter having been compromised with accused appellant‑Accused having already undergone part of sentence, matter having been compromised, and in view of circumstances of case, compromise accepted and accused‑petitioner acquitted.

Ch. Muhammad Shaukar Tarrar. Advocate and Syed Inayat Hussain Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Namo of the State.

Date of hearing 16th June, 1979.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J

.‑Abdul Haque, Abdul Majid and Abdul Rafique sons of the Khuda Bakhsh were convicted of an offence under section 325,/34, P. P. C. for causing injury to Muhammad Nawaz. Abdul Haque was sentenced to one year's R. I. while Majid and Rafi were sentenced to three months' R. I. each. Their appeal was dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Multan and their revision petition before the High Court met the same fate. They have therefore approached this Court.

2. On the last date of hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the parties have compromised and referred us to an affidavit sworn by Mohammad Nawaz complainant to that effect which is attached at page 23 of the paper‑book. Since Mohammad Nawaz complainant was not present in person, the case was adjourned and the sentences of the accused were suspended. The matter has again come up today. Mohammad Nawaz, complainant, the victim of the assault is present in person. He has confirmed that he had compromised the matter with the accused‑petitioners as a result of the intervention of some respectable .persons of the area.

3. Having regard to the circumstances of this case and the fact that out of the sentences awarded the petitioners have undergone a part of the sentences, we accept the compromise between the parties, convert this petition into an appeal and accept the same on the basis of the compromise between the parties and acquit the petitioners. They shall be released for with unless required in some other case.

Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Padidan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.