QAISER ALI KHAN versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
R4 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Petitioner Petitioner to hide the facts of the judicial service filed a constitutional petition for the correction of his date of birth, which was removed in the year 2006, on the basis that The applicant did not have one. Within two years, the applicant had requested the Registrar High Court to change his date of birth so that his service book was opened on the date that his service book was opened. Hold on to the fact of the previous constitutional application being dismissed. Chief Justice of the High Court requested that the petitioner pray for the implementation of the order of the Chief Justice that he was authorized to appoint, a matter related to correcting the applicant's date of birth in the Sindh Judicial Service Rules R4. In 1994, it was decided by the High Court Chief Justice that the judge's date of birth did not have the power to change the ICL officer except to send his recommendations to the government which would apparently be binding. If for some reason the knowledge of the Chief Justice is not brought in, then the recommendations cannot be accepted, but also in the knowledge of such aspect of the matter. To come. Administrative orders were always subject to judicial orders for the consideration of the Chief Justice. Only in accordance with the administrative recommendations could the applicants not be allowed to subpoena or revoke the decision in their own application. The Chief Justice is fully aware that there is already a judicial decision that rejected his request for a change in his date of birth, which apparently did not challenge the decision by the applicant.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
