Find a Lawyer

DR. RUBINA MANGI versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

R4 (1) Civil Servant Transfer and Posting Rules, 1974, Section 2 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Right-of-effect on the employment of civil service contract Petitioners / Officers Appointment Neither Government employees Can be declared. Civil Employee Transfer and Posting Rules provided in Section 2 (b) of 1974 do not compliment nor claim any particular right, especially in the absence of approval / appointment by the competent authority. Such definitions are exempted from Rule 4. (1) Under the Sindh Public Service Commission (Functions) Rules 1990, the post was banned for conducting tests for recruits which were to be filled on a contract for a specified period, through constitutional requests to the applicants. You have no right to claim your appointment. High Court rejects constitutional petition \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• WALI MUHAMMAD KHOSO v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Federal Secretary Information Government of Pakistan 2010 CLC 546
• MUHAMMAD ALI AFRIDI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Home Secretary, Karachi 2010 YLR 547
• EMEN TEXTILE through Sole Proprietor v. HABIB BANK LIMITED 2010 CLD 547
• MUHAMMAD AYUB v. MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE 2010 CLC 551
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI v. N.I.T. LIMITED 2010 PTD 553
• METAL CONSTRUCTION OF GREECE S.A. through Attorney v. OWNERS OF THE VESSEL M.V, LADY REA 2010 CLD 554
• Mst. HALIMA TAHIR v. Mst. NAHEED EJAZ 2010 MLD 554
• AKHTAR HUSSAIN v. ABDUL WAHEED 2010 YLR 558

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

patent advocate from Garh More lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes