Find a Lawyer

EMEN TEXTILE THROUGH SOLE PROPRIETOR versus HABIB BANK LIMITED

Appeals for the suit costs and funds award for the recovery of loans 31 and 22 of the Appellants had upheld the judgment and injunction, under which the banking court from the date of the institution to payment of the expenditure suit to the bank's lawyer Submitted that there were some contradictions contained in the amount claimed and decided by the Banking Court and proper accounting / calculation was not made for the appellant, the lawyer for the appellant had confessed to the lawyer's statement and The same did not dispute the integrity of the lawyer. The cost of the Fund could not be paid by the trial court from the date of the institution of this case and that under Section 3 (2) of Section 3 of the Financial Institutions (Security Finance) Ordinance 2001, the cost of the Fund may only be Rs. From the date of default, the trial court's decree was amended with the expenditure of the fund as stated in the statement from the date of the default to the realization.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• HABIB-UR-REHMAN v. Mst. HINA SAEED 2010 MLD 544
• ABDUL SATTAR alias HAKIM ALI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 545
• WALI MUHAMMAD KHOSO v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Federal Secretary Information Government of Pakistan 2010 CLC 546
• MUHAMMAD ALI AFRIDI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Home Secretary, Karachi 2010 YLR 547
• MUHAMMAD AYUB v. MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE 2010 CLC 551
• Dr. RUBINA MANGI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2010 PLC(CS) 552
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI v. N.I.T. LIMITED 2010 PTD 553
• METAL CONSTRUCTION OF GREECE S.A. through Attorney v. OWNERS OF THE VESSEL M.V, LADY REA 2010 CLD 554

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates from Chak Jamal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes