Find a Lawyer

ITTEHAD CHEMICALS LTD. versus VIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

A XVIII, R 4 & O XXIX, R 1 Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 3 Attendance of witnesses in court by a company (not a party in action) Approval of its Board of Directors by such witness Without the Identification Pricing Law, it is not required that every minor work or work done by a company be done only and only with the approval of its Board of Directors. The basic principles such as the appointment of principal officers, corporate litigation , Must be board approved. No approval of the Board of Directors will be required to send witnesses in a matter of directors that does not even have a company party rule

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES (PAKISTAN) LTD., KARACHI 2010 PTD 592
• FAZAL AKRAM v. State 2010 MLD 596
• MY BANK LIMITED v. FIRST DAWOOD INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED 2010 CLD 596
• GULSHAN ADAMJEE v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL Bank LTD. 2010 CLD 599
• MASOOD v. State 2010 PCrLJ 600
• MANZOOR v. State 2010 YLR 602
• AMEER GULA v. GULAB NOOR 2010 MLD 604
• AERO ASIA INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. v. SHELL PAKISTAN LIMITED 2010 YLR 611

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

advocate from Mailsi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes