Find a Lawyer

MY BANK LIMITED versus FIRST DAWOOD INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED

Sections 10 (7) and 27 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 151 Defendant's lawyer's absence before the court hearing the petition on the morning and reserved for the orders, before the petitioner passes through the lawyer. Filed in court that same day. The order requesting the lawyer to hear his arguments that he could not know how to settle such a case for hearing because he did not list his name under his name in the computerized list. And that it was learned by his partner in securing such matters for the order, that the plaintiff's lawyer had fully explained to the court the morning before his affidavit that the plaintiff had filed Copies and documents were not provided. Not giving his lawyer a fair opportunity to hear the defendants would violate the principles of natural justice and it would be condemned that the High Court carefully listened to the petitions of the unsuspecting claimants. application r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• PAKISTAN CRICKET BOARD through Manager National Stadium, Karachi v. DIRECTOR/DISTRICT OFFICER, PROPERTY/ENTERTAINMENT TAX 2010 YLR 591
• INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN v. BALOCH ENGINEERING INDUSTRY (PVT.) LTD. 2010 CLD 591
• COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES (PAKISTAN) LTD., KARACHI 2010 PTD 592
• FAZAL AKRAM v. State 2010 MLD 596
• GULSHAN ADAMJEE v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL Bank LTD. 2010 CLD 599
• ITTEHAD CHEMICALS LTD. v. VIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE 2010 CLC 599
• MASOOD v. State 2010 PCrLJ 600
• MANZOOR v. State 2010 YLR 602

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

top civil advocates from Gojra lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes