The trial court dismissed the case for the trial of the section 42 trial, but the appellate court allowed the appeal and dismissed it as the court concluded that the plaintiff had no rights or title to the property. Was, so this matter should be excluded. An allotment of suit property, no allotment or false allotment in favor of the defendant who claimed to have purchased the property cannot be decided only if proper action has been taken against the government by the defendant. And such other parties as may be necessary and appropriate. And then after the evidence had to decide whether the defendant had any right or title to the suit property, the High Court deemed it appropriate not to take part in the discussion regarding the defendant's title and privilege and said that The matter has yet to be finalized. The decisions and orders of the proceedings were approved by the courts, they were set aside, the lawsuit filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed, and the defendants were required to establish their rights / title in relation to the suit property in accordance with the law. Was left at liberty to take appropriate action. Meanwhile, the government was instructed to evict the plaintiffs and take possession of the underground land and then deal with the matter according to law.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
