Find a Lawyer

RASOOL BUX versus STATE

Section 497 was involved in the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 (b) and 365, and nothing was found in the abduction FIR, which opened fire on the accused or injured persons and the accused had stolen something from the house. ? There was nothing available on the record that the accused snatched the Quran and threw it in the field of sugarcane and the accused had abducted the complainant's mamas, the accused was admitted on bail,

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• BAHARO alias BAHAR ALI v. GHULAM RASOOL 2010 CLC 754
• ANSARI SUGAR MILLS LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARACHI 2010 PTD 755
• HASIL v. State 2010 YLR 756
• TAHIR OMER INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. v. M.T. PACIFIC JADE 2010 CLD 757
• SABIR AHMED v. State 2010 YLR 760
• PAKISTAN KUWAIT INVESTMENT COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. v. SAADULAH KHAN AND BROTHERS 2010 CLD 760
• ZOHRA BEGUM v. SAJIDA BEGUM 2010 YLR 763
• MUBARAK v. State 2010 PCrLJ 764

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Nawab Shah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes