Sections 394/34 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (b) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 397 and 561 of a robbery / robbery and weapons convict, who have already been charged with another offense. The sentence has been pronounced. A case was registered against him under section 394/34, the PPC and the trial court have sentenced him to four years imprisonment. Another FIR was filed under Section 13 (b) of the IRIS West. The Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, was registered against the same accused in the same police station and the judicial magistrate convicted him and sentenced him to two years imprisonment. The RI accused had filed before the trial court that two of the same crime. The order for the two convictions to be passed in separate cases should be run concurrently because such request was not made at the relevant time for unknown reasons, Additional Advocate General did not object to the approval of the accused's request. However, the trial court concluded that under the meaning of section 7 of the, the CRPC was required to hear the case S was necessary to pass the time. And if such order was not approved for any reason or for any unknowable error, then it cannot be approved at this stage as it would be equivalent to amending the judgment which is subject to section 369. Not valid, the CRPC trial court further observed that such an order could at the same time be granted by the High Court only in the exercise of its powers under section 61 A61 A, CR. That is, there was an inadvertent error in the trial court's order to grant the applicant a simultaneous sentence waiver. , ?
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
