Find a Lawyer

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus MEHMOOD AHMED KHAN

Section 156 (1) (8) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 The Smuggling Appeal Against Britain's Counsel for the Appellant / Complainant stated that the main evidence against the accused was the credible information that the customs inspector provided in his Tell the information received from the informant. Such information cannot be relied upon without an Investigation Officer who can only use Investigation Officers to guide them in identifying the crime and collecting evidence, however confidential information, though valid, may be legal. I could not use the trial court in a legal way;

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN v. FAZAL AND SONS (PVT.) LTD 2010 CLC 1895
• THE STATE/ANTI NARCOTICS FORCE v. MEHBOOB UR REHMAN AFRIDI 2010 MLD 1896
• AHSANULLAH A. KHAIRI v. State 2010 YLR 1902
• MUHAMMAD RASHEED HASSAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1902
• ZIARAT KHAN v. State 2010 MLD 1908
• NADEEM AHMED ANSARI v. FRONTIER WORKS ORGANIZATION through Group Commander 2010 CLC 1910
• ATHER HUSSAIN v. State 2010 MLD 1913
• Haji ABDUL AZIZ v. KARACHI PORT TRUST 2010 MLD 1916

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates from Astore lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes