Sections 164 and 364 Criminal confessions and extra-judicial confessions Recording points and co-operation with them in relation to the confessional statement: The judicial confession should be before the crime authority who accepts such confession. Extra judicial confession should not be taken as a confession, but only the statement of the witness that he heard saying he had committed the crime. Such evidence should be substantiated by other evidence and circumstances of the case. Judicial confession should be recorded as soon as possible and as soon as possible. And if there is a delay in recording the judicial confession, the reasons for such a delay must be given. Delays in recording a confession may be relevant to determining his or her willingness, however, delayed confession will not be non-disciplinary. Extra judicial confessions, while recording the provisions of Sections 164 & 4 364, must be strictly adhered to by the CCPC, as these provisions were mandated. In violation of the provisions of Section 646464, the CCP was not merely an irregularity that could be remedied. It was an illegal operation that would go to the root of the confession and eliminate its apparent cost. The terms of the person who confesses to admitting the crime were very strict and strict in the Shariah. When an accused has accounted for the incident in a judicial confession, its truth should not be doubted. And if such statements were substantiated in all its parts, such isolated evidence could be used against the accused without further co-operation. There was no fundamental difference between the judicial confession and the retreating judicial confession, if they were justified
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
