Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RASHEED versus NASRULLAH

Impact of Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Impact of Constitution Petition Issues During the implementation of the order, the applicants applied for separation of the order under section 12 (2), CPC. Filed by the trial court and the lower one at the same time. The Appellate Court had raised by the applicants that matters should have been settled before deciding the application under Section 12 (2) CPC. In each application, it was not necessary and necessary to decide the matter and present the evidence as the applicant had no right, title or interest. As for the properties in the property that were overturned by the defendants, the applicants were not subjected to discrimination in any way by the judgment and order passed by the trial court High Court under the jurisdiction of the court. The two lower courts were dismissed in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• Mst. ZAINAB KHATOON v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER QAMBAR/SHAHDAD KOT 2010 YLR 304
• MUTUAL FUNDS ASSOCIATION OF PAKISTAN (MUFAP) v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan 2010 PLC 306
• ZAINUL ABDIN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 307
• YOUSUF AZIZ v. ASIM SALEEM 2010 CLC 308
• EIJAZ AHMED SHAH v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Federal Establishment Secretary, Cabinet secretariat Establishment Di 2010 PLD 309
• Haji MUHAMMAD ALI KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 310
• KHAN alias KHAN MUHAMMAD MANGRIO v. State 2010 MLD 311
• GHULAM MUJTABA PARACHA v. MUHAMMAD SALEEM 2010 CLD 311

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

female advocates from Nankana Sahib lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes