The accused's name was not disclosed in the Section 497 (2) Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Qatel M. Bail, Grant of Further Investigation, nor any of the defamatory material recovered from his possession during interrogation. The incident happened on the basis of the victim's wife's contrary statement, in which she said that the deceased was last seen with the accused and that another person's wife was also arrested on the basis of the statement of the deceased's mother and not her. He was an eyewitness. Regarding the alleged disclosure of the incident site by the accused, neither the contents of the incident nor any defamatory material were kept on record to suggest the accused's involvement in the commission of the crime; Not only was the FIR mentioned, but the incident memorandum was not a secret place in the investigation memorandum, revealing that the accused would be barred from making a concession in the bail case. r Inquiry, under the circumstances, the accused was admitted on bail
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
