Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. KISHWAR SULTANA versus CHIEF MARTIAL LAW ADMINISTRATOR, ETC.


Martial Law Order 1977 No 12 Detention No specific instance is cited, nor is there any criminal history of criminal and law-keeping or German-run government in the country. In the circumstances, with no legal authority and no legal effect

1979 P Cr. L J 757

[Lahore]

Before Shafi-ur-Rehman, Zakiuddin Pal and Gul Muhammad Khan, JJ

Mst. KISHWAR SULTANA---Petitioner

versus

CHIEF MARTIAL LAW ADMINISTRATOR, ETC.---Respondents

Writ Petition No. 1301, of 1978, decided on 10th June, 1978.

Martial Law Orner (C. M. h. A.'s 12 of 1977) [as amended by Martial Law Order (C. M.

L. A.'s 33 of 1977)---

--- Detention-No particular instance cited nor any criminal his tory germane to maintenance of law and order or running of orderly Government in country indicated in respect of detenu-- Only, subjective opinion with no foundation at all forming basis of impugned order--Order, held, without lawful authority and of no legal effect, in circumstances.-[Preventive detention].

Muhammad Rafiq Chauhan for Petitioner.

Khalil Ramday,A. A.-G. and Ch. Muhammad Yamin for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 31st May, 1978.

JUDGMENT

SHAFI-UR-REHMAN, J.--

-This petition is moved by Mst. Kishwar Sultana challenging the detention of Arif Nawaz, her husband, under Martial Law Order No. 12, as amended by Martial Law Order No. 33. The detention order was passed on 8th March, 1978, directing his detention for three months.

2. The respondent was called upon to furnish the material on the basis of which the preventive detention had been ordered. It has been made available in the form of a report by the S.H O. Police Station, Yakki Gate. The material is contained in the column of general remarks and is to the following effect

"He has been taking active part in the recent subversive agitation of the P.P.P. against the Government."

No particular instance is cited. No criminal history germane to the maintenance of law and order or the running of orderly Government in the country is indicated in respect of the detenu. What has been reproduced as material in the remarks columns is only a subjective opinion with no foundation at all. Hence the petition was allowed and the detention order was declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect. The detenu was ordered to be released forthwith if her was not required in any other matter.

Petition allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Mirpur Khas lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.