The cancellation of the magistrate's orders after the police agreed to settle the case under Section 457/395 Criminal Code (v. 1898), sections 1373 and 561 orders B \ Class brought the investigating officer a charge against the accused. Was instructed. According to the court law, the names of the witnesses were given in the FIR who confirmed the complainant's version of the incident. After registering the police FIR, the police were to be involved in the case for two months and the FIR Did not complain to the Judicial Magistrate for filing an FIR, the police officers were alleged that the magistrate had a hearing offense, which was the order of the Speaking Order Magistrate while acting as a court complainant. Didn't need to hear, but if he himself was hearing the complainant or his lawyer who was in court or who Hume had otherwise requested a hearing, especially when it was alleged that the police was against the officers, that any prejudice should not be considered as being in strange and unusual circumstances of the police because the aforesaid hearing of the magistrate. There was no prejudice or no material was available to assist the court in examining police papers or the court did not open its own inquiry, thus, to try to annoy the magistrate. Was placed and the application was dismissed under the circumstances. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
