Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FATEH DIN versus STATE


Section 426 (1A) (C) of the Constitution does not apply since the petition was filed after the suspension of the sentence for a period of two years. Yes, the applicant cannot demand a suspension. As for the suspension of the sentence, the confirmation of the sentence is given in the appeal, which is likely to not be heard soon [delay in bail].

1979 P Cr. L J 391

[Lahore]

Before M. Dilawar Mahmood, J

FATEH DIN---Petitioner

versus

THE STATE---Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 799 of 1976 and Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3 of 1978, decided on 5th July 1978.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---

-- S. 426-Sentence, suspension of-Petitioner seeking suspension of sentence on ground of lapse of two years since appal filed-Provisions of law existing under S. 426(1-A)(c) not being applicable, petitioner, held, cannot demand suspension of sentence as of right-Suspension of sentence, however, granted in view of appeal not likely to be heard shortly.-[Bail-Delay].

Mian Qur6an Sadiq Ikram for Petitioner.

Afazuddin for the State.

ORDER

This is an application under section 426, Cr. P. C. for the suspension of sentence of the appellant. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner/ appellant that he was convicted by au order of the Magistrate section 30, Pindigheb, on 28th June 1976. He is undergoing 7 years' R. I. under section 392, P. P. C. Suspension of sentence of the petitioner is sought on the ground that more than two years have elapsed since the filing of the appeal.

2. Learned counsel for the State is not in a position to state when this appeal is likely to come up for hearing. He, therefore, does not oppose this application.

3. Section 426 (I-A)(C) empowers the Court to order the release of a convict person on bail if he bas been sentenced to imprisonment for life or imprisonment exceeding 7 years and whose appeal has not been decided within a period of 2 years of his conviction. Strictly speaking the case of the petitioner/appellant does not come within the ambit of this provision. He has been sentenced to 7 years' R. I. His imprison ment, therefore, does not exceed 7 years. In my view he cannot demand the suspension of sentence as of right. In the circumstances, however, when it is submitted by the learned counsel for the State that appeal is not likely to come up for hearing shortly I deem it proper to suspend the sentence of the petitioner/appellant subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.-G., Talagang.

Sentence suspended.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
female advocates from Gujranwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.