Article 199 Constitutional petition claimed for a land allotment for applicants that, regardless of the issuance of a grant of land to the applicants, the Executive District Officer (Revenue) took notice of the land allotment to the disputed land. Canceled in favor of applicants without By giving them and the lawyer a hearing, it is further claimed that the notice did not show the address of the applicant, besides the name of the applicant. This statement stated in this outrageous order that notices were issued to provide documentary evidence to substantiate the claim of land allotment on the facts; the Assistant Advocate General disagreed with the fact that even before that. Notices were not issued to the applicants. His allotment was canceled, but by the contents of the inappropriate order and the reason for the title, it confirmed the fact that when the executive district officer had no address, how were the notices issued, even otherwise. I did not satisfactorily explain, other than the Assistant Advocate General, Inc., how notices were issued to them without the applicant's address; the applicants did not get a hearing before passing an invalid order, the executive The decree passed by the District Officer (Revenue) was set aside and the matter The decision was called in later. Notice matters to applicants and all concerned giving them an opportunity
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
