Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAHZAD versus STATE

Section 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392/34 Bail of the Robbery, the defendant's denial failed to prove that the mobile recovered from his possession was his personal property The State Council had pointed out that the accused had been acquitted by him. Was involved in several related cases. The offender could not be released because of the FIR money involved in the Street Crimes various police stations, but the bail cannot be extended due to the criminal trial by the accused trial court, however, it can be initiated immediately. Was instructed. Matter and dispose of it in due time

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• AQEEL AHMED v. FAREED AHMED 2010 YLR 2053
• ABDUL MAJEED v. State 2010 YLR 2125
• MUHAMMAD YOUSUF v. State 2010 YLR 2129
• MUMTAZ alias KAKA v. State 2010 YLR 2146
• TAUFIQ BAWA v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI through Nazim-e-Aala 2010 YLR 2165
• ZAHID HUSSAIN v. State 2010 YLR 2166
• SHAHID HUSSAIN v. State 2010 YLR 2170
• MUHAMMAD LAIK v. State 2010 YLR 2176

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

top advocate from North Wazirstan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes