TAUFIQ BAWA versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI THROUGH NAZIM-E-AALA
The constitutional petition of Arts 199 and 9 affected applicants' action by extending the boundary of the partition, under which the park boundary was increased. The petitioner's objection was that the park was extended beyond the limits of the petitions to the drainage water, thus affecting their freelance property. Accessing a 60-foot wide road on one side. And on the other hand, he claimed the important responsibilities of the water was to increase the limits of the central part of the water in order to protect the water from further encroachment and misuse. Was done, so one would look inside the house. Applicants guaranteed under Article 9 of the Constitution by violating their privacy, and affecting their right to enjoy their assets The constitutional petition was dealt with on the condition that the applicants own their lease. According to the property, the boundary wall will be constructed. The Authority will provide a two-way lane between the park and the applicant's residence that provides free entry and exit routes to their respective residence and 60 feet wide road-connected lanes. And that the park and its boundaries be constructed in such a way that it does not affect the privacy of the applicants \ accommodation \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
