Section 498 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), sections 302, 343 and 395 offenses against property (Enforcement Hood) ordinance (VI 1979), section 17 (3) murder and robbery pre-arrest warrant, denying the names of the accused F The presence of the accused in connection with the specific role presented in the IRR, as well as the statements of the prosecution witnesses under Section 161, CRPC, as well as the facts stated in the FIR, proved that the police officer As a result, he was abused and abused. His authority and the conditions for preventing the complainant's post-mortem from approving the anticipated bail were that, on the basis of the arrest, there would be genuine evidence of the accused's arrest and harassment, his extraordinary intentions. In order to guarantee a pre-arrest, the accused should be used a little bit without arrest, and while doing so, the court should keep in mind that the principle of pre-arrest bail approval is different from the principle of approval of a pre-arrest bail. All were told that in the present case, the situation was not attracted as to why Not that the accused, who was a police officer, was not arrested for long because he belonged to the police department, he not only violated Article 9 of the constitution but also committed the murder of innocent person. Who had lost the trust of ordinary people in the care of life, people's property and property. Police were involved in riots at the police premises, or no crime was committed. Police officials, on the contrary, were tasked with preventing crime, while the accused themselves were involved in the killing of an innocent person in the police. Of crime
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
