Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus CHIEF CONTROLLER OF BILLING, K.E.S.C., KARACHI

Article 199 Electricity Act (IX of 1910), Article 26 Maintaining the Constitutional Request Capacity The demand for exaggeration / bogus bills by the Electric Supply Company can be determined only after a record is passed by a civil court. Such a process cannot be brought under constitutional jurisdiction. Due to the inability of the Electric Inspector and the Civil Court to apply to the High Court, a suitable alternative method was available to the court applicant prior to the dismissal of such application

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• NASEER v. State 2010 YLR 2889
• FIDA MUHAMMAD v. State 2010 YLR 2901
• MUHAMMAD MUDASIR v. State 2010 YLR 2910
• AZIM KHAN v. State 2010 YLR 2917
• NAUSHABA ZUBERI v. QUALITY CONSTRUCTION (PVT.) LTD. 2010 YLR 2971
• GULRAIZ AHMED RAZA v. CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU (NAB) 2010 YLR 2977
• AMJAD AMEEN v. State 2010 YLR 2993
• MUJAHID ALI v. State 2010 YLR 3010

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

tax advocates from Tobatek Singh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes