Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HUSSAIN BUX versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE KHAIRPUR


Section 115 Reviewed with Section 107 Review District Judge The basis of the exercise of jurisdiction under section 107 under Tender Section 115 does not enjoy such power acquired by the appellate court under section 115, in section 115 One of the specific conditions is the condition of existence. The reviewing court allows any person to make amendments without any legal justification under Section 9, Special Relief Act (I of 1877), without any reference to such condition and without justification. Holds any legal authority and sets aside the Special Relief Act (I of 1877). , Articles 8 and 9 [Revision (Civil)]

P L D 1979 Karachi 475

Before Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim and Ajmal Mian, JJ

HUSSAIN BUX‑Petitioner

versus

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KHAIRPUR AND 8 OTHERS

Respondents

Constitutional Petition No. 208 of 1976, decided on 18th October 1978.

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑

S. 115 read with S. 107‑Revision‑District Judge hearing revision application tinder S. 115‑Does not enjoy same power as enjoyed by an appellate Court under S. 107‑‑Basis of exercise of jurisdiction under S. 115‑Held, preconditional to existence of any of conditions specified in S. 115‑Revisional Court allowing revision without adverting to any such condition and without justification converting suit under S. 9 into one under S. 8, Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)‑Such judgment held, without lawful authority and set aside‑Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 8 & 9.‑[Revision (civil)].

Fazal Muhammad v. Muhammad Usman P L D 1970 Lah. 560 and Abdul Aziz v. Mst. Doulat Bibl and 3 others P L D 1973 Lah. 125 fool.

Mst. Jalna and others v. Hussain and another P L D 1963 Kar. 531 and Abdul Jamil v. Haroon P L D 1969 Kar. 78 distinguished.

Muharnmad Hussain Munir and others v. Sikandar and others P L D 1974 S C 139 ref.

S. H. RIM for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondent No. 1.

Respondent No. 2 (absent).

A. F. Memon for L. Rs. of Respondent No. 3.

Date of hearing : llth October 1978.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Machi Goth lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.