Find a Lawyer

DR. SHAHID MEHBOOB RANA versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY

Article 199 Constitutional application The Vice Chancellor, the selection and appointment of discrimination influence challenged the selection and appointment of the Vice-Chancellor of the University on the basis that the applicants for the selection of the Vice-Chancellor's office. The advertisement was illegal and did not meet the guidelines issued by the Higher Education Commission Petitioners for eligibility for the said office and further claimed that local qualified PhDs were being discriminated against by authorities. Emphasized that the Higher Education Commission qualifies for any guidelines, decisions or suggestions. The quality of the yacht has not been violated. The controversial ad mentions that the jacket position needs to be checked in line with the guidelines issued by the High Education Commission record that it was revealed that the local PhD was also not carefully excluded by the controversial advertisement. Only those who stopped success were given priority. Hockey degree from a renowned foreign university revised in accordance with guidelines and spirit issued by the Higher Education Commission in relation to the eligibility criteria set forth in the applicants advertisement and the guidelines issued by the Higher Education Commission Could not identify conflicts. Constitutional petitions rejected by the High Court

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• State v. ZULFIQAR ALI 2010 YLR 765
• MUHAMMAD BILAL v. State 2010 MLD 766
• ALLAH BAKHSH v. FAZAL AHMED 2010 YLR 768
• MASOOD AHMAD v. SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2010 MLD 768
• JAHANGIR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 769
• RIAZ-UL-HAQ SHEIKH v. ZULFIQAR HUSSAIN 2010 CLC 770
• MUHAMMAD ASIM v. State 2010 PCrLJ 771
• MUHAMMAD MUNIR AHMAD v. State 2010 YLR 772

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

female advocates from Musafir Khana lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes