MASOOD AHMAD versus SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
After collecting section 10, 32 and 34 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitutional Application Temporary Farming Scheme, the Collector was entitled to acquire the proprietary rights through the Collector of the State Land Lease. , Respondents' Enrolled Respondents from the Country by Applicants, Suspended by the Board of Revenue, Disappointed by the Plaintiff in Relationship with Revenue Staff, Before Granting Proprietary Rights to the Applicant in Kidney Grove Demands to be expelled, filed by the respondents and directed to keep them in their possession Done. Of the land, which was accordingly collected by the Collector. Respondents filed their names in Khasra Kidwadi for the purpose of obtaining the canceled land in the name of the applicant, and then moved their names in the same manner, the member, the Board of Revenue Respondent Collector, passed the prohibited order. Instead of possessing the property, the underground land under the prohibited order was obliged to report to the Board of Revenue that the possession of the applicant had been restored even before the approval of such order. And even then the reinstatement order could not be approved against the applicant. During the hearing of the constitutional petition, filing a case by the respondents for a permanent injunction was a malicious act and the respondents obtained the interim order by putting the case in the dark in the High Court. ? The order of the collector shall be suspended without any legal authority and without any legal effect
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
